earth is a lie
“The Myth of Human Progress” - Chris Hedges

Clive Hamilton in his “Requiem for a Species: Why We Resist the Truth About Climate Change” describes a dark relief that comes from accepting that “catastrophic climate change is virtually certain.” This obliteration of “false hopes,” he says, requires an intellectual knowledge and an emotional knowledge. The first is attainable. The second, because it means that those we love, including our children, are almost certainly doomed to insecurity, misery and suffering within a few decades, if not a few years, is much harder to acquire. To emotionally accept impending disaster, to attain the gut-level understanding that the power elite will not respond rationally to the devastation of the ecosystem, is as difficult to accept as our own mortality. The most daunting existential struggle of our time is to ingest this awful truth—intellectually and emotionally—and continue to resist the forces that are destroying us.

The human species, led by white Europeans and Euro-Americans, has been on a 500-year-long planetwide rampage of conquering, plundering, looting, exploiting and polluting the Earth—as well as killing the indigenous communities that stood in the way. But the game is up. The technical and scientific forces that created a life of unparalleled luxury—as well as unrivaled military and economic power—for the industrial elites are the forces that now doom us. The mania for ceaseless economic expansion and exploitation has become a curse, a death sentence. But even as our economic and environmental systems unravel, after the hottest year in the contiguous 48 states since record keeping began 107 years ago, we lack the emotional and intellectual creativity to shut down the engine of global capitalism. We have bound ourselves to a doomsday machine that grinds forward, as the draft report of the National Climate Assessment and Development Advisory Committee illustrates.

Complex civilizations have a bad habit of destroying themselves. Anthropologists including Joseph Tainter in “The Collapse of Complex Societies,” Charles L. Redman in “Human Impact on Ancient Environments” and Ronald Wright in “A Short History of Progress” have laid out the familiar patterns that lead to systems breakdown. The difference this time is that when we go down the whole planet will go with us. There will, with this final collapse, be no new lands left to exploit, no new civilizations to conquer, no new peoples to subjugate. The long struggle between the human species and the Earth will conclude with the remnants of the human species learning a painful lesson about unrestrained greed and self-worship.

“There is a pattern in the past of civilization after civilization wearing out its welcome from nature, overexploiting its environment, overexpanding, overpopulating,” Wright said when I reached him by phone at his home in British Columbia, Canada. “They tend to collapse quite soon after they reach their period of greatest magnificence and prosperity. That pattern holds good for a lot of societies, among them the Romans, the ancient Maya and the Sumerians of what is now southern Iraq. There are many other examples, including smaller-scale societies such as Easter Island. The very things that cause societies to prosper in the short run, especially new ways to exploit the environment such as the invention of irrigation, lead to disaster in the long run because of unforeseen complications. This is what I called in ‘A Short History of Progress’ the ‘progress trap.’ We have set in motion an industrial machine of such complexity and such dependence on expansion that we do not know how to make do with less or move to a steady state in terms of our demands on nature. We have failed to control human numbers. They have tripled in my lifetime. And the problem is made much worse by the widening gap between rich and poor, the upward concentration of wealth, which ensures there can never be enough to go around. The number of people in dire poverty today—about 2 billion—is greater than the world’s entire population in the early 1900s. That’s not progress.”

“If we continue to refuse to deal with things in an orderly and rational way, we will head into some sort of major catastrophe, sooner or later,” he said. “If we are lucky it will be big enough to wake us up worldwide but not big enough to wipe us out. That is the best we can hope for. We must transcend our evolutionary history. We’re Ice Age hunters with a shave and a suit. We are not good long-term thinkers. We would much rather gorge ourselves on dead mammoths by driving a herd over a cliff than figure out how to conserve the herd so it can feed us and our children forever. That is the transition our civilization has to make. And we’re not doing that.”

Wright, who in his dystopian novel “A Scientific Romance” paints a picture of a future world devastated by human stupidity, cites “entrenched political and economic interests” and a failure of the human imagination as the two biggest impediments to radical change. And all of us who use fossil fuels, who sustain ourselves through the formal economy, he says, are at fault.

Modern capitalist societies, Wright argues in his book “What Is America?: A Short History of the New World Order,” derive from European invaders’ plundering of the indigenous cultures in the Americas from the 16th to the 19th centuries, coupled with the use of African slaves as a workforce to replace the natives. The numbers of those natives fell by more than 90 percent because of smallpox and other plagues they hadn’t had before. The Spaniards did not conquer any of the major societies until smallpox had crippled them; in fact the Aztecs beat them the first time around. If Europe had not been able to seize the gold of the Aztec and Inca civilizations, if it had not been able to occupy the land and adopt highly productive New World crops for use on European farms, the growth of industrial society in Europe would have been much slower. Karl Marx and Adam Smith both pointed to the influx of wealth from the Americas as having made possible the Industrial Revolution and the start of modern capitalism. It was the rape of the Americas, Wright points out, that triggered the orgy of European expansion. The Industrial Revolution also equipped the Europeans with technologically advanced weapons systems, making further subjugation, plundering and expansion possible.

“The experience of a relatively easy 500 years of expansion and colonization, the constant taking over of new lands, led to the modern capitalist myth that you can expand forever,” Wright said. “It is an absurd myth. We live on this planet. We can’t leave it and go somewhere else. We have to bring our economies and demands on nature within natural limits, but we have had a 500-year run where Europeans, Euro-Americans and other colonists have overrun the world and taken it over. This 500-year run made it not only seem easy but normal. We believe things will always get bigger and better. We have to understand that this long period of expansion and prosperity was an anomaly. It has rarely happened in history and will never happen again. We have to readjust our entire civilization to live in a finite world. But we are not doing it, because we are carrying far too much baggage, too many mythical versions of deliberately distorted history and a deeply ingrained feeling that what being modern is all about is having more. This is what anthropologists call an ideological pathology, a self-destructive belief that causes societies to crash and burn. These societies go on doing things that are really stupid because they can’t change their way of thinking. And that is where we are.”

And as the collapse becomes palpable, if human history is any guide, we like past societies in distress will retreat into what anthropologists call “crisis cults.” The powerlessness we will feel in the face of ecological and economic chaos will unleash further collective delusions, such as fundamentalist belief in a god or gods who will come back to earth and save us.

“Societies in collapse often fall prey to the belief that if certain rituals are performed all the bad stuff will go away,” Wright said. “There are many examples of that throughout history. In the past these crisis cults took hold among people who had been colonized, attacked and slaughtered by outsiders, who had lost control of their lives. They see in these rituals the ability to bring back the past world, which they look at as a kind of paradise. They seek to return to the way things were. Crisis cults spread rapidly among Native American societies in the 19th century, when the buffalo and the Indians were being slaughtered by repeating rifles and finally machine guns. People came to believe, as happened in the Ghost Dance, that if they did the right things the modern world that was intolerable—the barbed wire, the railways, the white man, the machine gun—would disappear.”

“We all have the same, basic psychological hard wiring,” Wright said. “It makes us quite bad at long-range planning and leads us to cling to irrational delusions when faced with a serious threat. Look at the extreme right’s belief that if government got out of the way, the lost paradise of the 1950s would return. Look at the way we are letting oil and gas exploration rip when we know that expanding the carbon economy is suicidal for our children and grandchildren. The results can already be felt. When it gets to the point where large parts of the Earth experience crop failure at the same time then we will have mass starvation and a breakdown in order. That is what lies ahead if we do not deal with climate change.”

“If we fail in this great experiment, this experiment of apes becoming intelligent enough to take charge of their own destiny, nature will shrug and say it was fun for a while to let the apes run the laboratory, but in the end it was a bad idea,” Wright said.

It’s not a left vs. right issue. It’s not on any spectrum you’ve ever been taught in school. It’s about the survival of our species and our planet. And everyone is fucking it up.

Source.

King Missile - Take Stuff From Work

Ludlow Massacre

The Ludlow Massacre was an attack by the Colorado National Guard and Colorado Fuel & Iron Company camp guards on a tent colony of 1,200 striking coal miners and their families at Ludlow, Colorado on April 20, 1914.

The massacre resulted in the violent deaths of between 19 and 25 people; sources vary but all sources include two women and eleven children, asphyxiated and burned to death under a single tent. The deaths occurred after a daylong fight between militia and camp guards against striking workers. Ludlow was the deadliest single incident in the southern Colorado Coal Strike, lasting from September 1913 through December 1914. The strike was organized by the United Mine Workers of America (UMWA) against coal mining companies in Colorado. The three largest companies involved were the Rockefeller family-owned Colorado Fuel & Iron Company (CF&I), the Rocky Mountain Fuel Company (RMF), and the Victor-American Fuel Company (VAF).

In retaliation for Ludlow, the miners armed themselves and attacked dozens of mines over the next ten days, destroying property and engaging in several skirmishes with the Colorado National Guard along a 40-mile front from Trinidad to Walsenburg. The entire strike would cost between 69 and 199 lives. Thomas Franklin Andrews described it as the “deadliest strike in the history of the United States”.

The Ludlow Massacre was a watershed moment in American labor relations. Historian Howard Zinn described the Ludlow Massacre as “the culminating act of perhaps the most violent struggle between corporate power and laboring men in American history”. Congress responded to public outcry by directing the House Committee on Mines and Mining to investigate the incident. Its report, published in 1915, was influential in promoting child labor laws and an eight-hour work day.

The Ludlow site, 12 miles (19 km) northwest of Trinidad, Colorado, is now a ghost town. The massacre site is owned by the UMWA, which erected a granite monument in memory of the miners and their families who died that day. The Ludlow Tent Colony Site was designated a National Historic Landmark on January 16, 2009, and dedicated on June 28, 2009. Modern archeological investigation largely supports the strikers’ reports of the event.

Know your history, or you’re doomed to repeat it.

Source.

If you’ve got 1.5 free hours this week, watch Collapse on Netflix. It succinctly encapsulates everything that is going on in the world, why, and what will come to pass. Be the hundredth monkey. 

How much do you really need?

How thinly veiled, this American greed.

You don’t need that new iPad. You don’t even want it. You FEEL like you do, because they’ve conditioned you to have an emotional response with the products you buy, the things you consume. You will be HAPPY with your new iPad. It will be FUN. It will provide more ENJOYMENT than the one you currently have. Who cares what will happen with your old one? There is a new one! EXCITEMENT! It has new whistles and bells and preforms oral sex on you and will be the best thing you’ve ever purchased until a new one comes out months later. Guess what happens at that point?
earthisalie
Thomas H. Naylor on Leviathan, Secession and Vermont’s Small Nation Dream

A nation that has nearly 1,000 military bases in 153 countries, by definition, cannot be anything other than an empire.

President Obama’s 2012 “Proud to be an American” State of the Union address was little more than a collection of narcissistic American clichés aggrandizing our military prowess and hyping war with Iran. Among the Republican candidates for president, only Ron Paul has not engaged in this form of demagogic drivel. As today’s most war-like nation, America’s penchant for trying to solve complex geopolitical problems with simplistically violent and destructive military solutions goes virtually unchallenged.

Unfortunately, there is absolutely nothing new about the notion of American exceptionalism. Its historical origins can be traced back to the concept of “Manifest Destiny” or “God’s will” to justify our annihilation of Native Americans starting in the 16th century. Although our nation was founded on the principles of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, the story of how Native Americans were relentlessly forced to abandon their homes and lands and move into Indian territories to make room for American states is one of arrogance, greed and raw military power.

The barbaric conquest of Native Americans continued for several hundred years and involved many of our most cherished national heroes, including George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, James Monroe and Andrew Jackson, to mention only a few. Adding insult to injury, the US government has violated over 300 treaties, which were signed to protect the rights of the American Indians.

In over 200 years, the North American continent has never been attacked – nor even seriously threatened with invasion by Japan, Germany, the Soviet Union, or anyone else. Despite this fact, over a million Americans have been killed in wars and trillions of dollars have been spent by the military – $13 trillion on the Cold War alone.

1. Denunciation. The United States has lost its moral authority and is unsustainable, ungovernable and unfixable.

2. Disengagement. I don’t want to go down with the Titanic.

3. Demystification. Secession is a viable option constitutionally, politically and economically.

4. Defiance. I personally want to help take my state back from big business, big market and big government, and I want to do so peacefully.

Read Article Here

The Bigger Picture

Perspective. It is the most important aspect when considering any social issue. One must attempt to grasp as many contributing factors as possible when critically analyzing a situation in order to draw the most informed conclusion.

Perspective goes beyond seeing something from another angle. Perspective involves being able to step outside of what “is”, the predefined and taken-for-granted societal institutions and cultural normatives, and see things in their true form.

Through the cognitive transcendence of the artificial constructs of human society, one can look past the symptoms of racism, misogyny, patriarchy, rape culture, consumerism, government, imperialism, and globalized capitalistic exploitation, and expose the pathogens: statism, and the very notion of ownership.

Our entire society is predicated upon the ridiculous abstraction that a person can own a thing, including sections of the Earth. Think abut that for a moment. How can anyone really own anything? The only things you can own are the things you can control without exerting force externally - your body and your mind. Anything else you think you own is either an inanimate object or an intangible concept which society has artificially granted you ownersip of through law or which you otherwise obtained and consider your property, or is a sentient being which you exert forceful control over (pets, livestock, children).

Thus, ownership is established either through law or by force. So what are laws? Rules governing behavior in society everyone is mandated to obey or face retributive punishment. The concept of law, like the concept of ownership, is an abstract human invention. A law is nothing unless there is force. Ownership is nothing unless there is force. A pattern is beginning to emerge.

Now let’s go back to the discussion of societal maladies (racism, imperialism, etc.) While these issues evolve from ideas, you cannot combat an idea. The idea “black people are unintelligent criminals who excel at poverty” is irrelevant to ending racism as it exists in society. While this idea is offensive, by itself it poses no threat. Ideas only pose a threat when they are given force. Ideas are given force through institutionalization, or using the idea to dictate the actions of an entity (institution) which exhibits force.

Racism, sexism, imperialism - they are all institutionalized ideas. To eradicate them, you must eradicate the institutions through which they are exercised. The institution which exercises these, among many other attrocities, is the state.

The state (or nation) is another human invention. It evolved from the idea that you can draw lines on a map depicting a section of Earth, and declare ownership of the territory inside the lines you have drawn in the name of one or more humans. Through the state, ideas like racism and imperialism are institutionalied, giving rise to such glorious human achievements as slavery, the Banana Wars, apartheid, genocide, and Israel.

The state makes laws. The state grants ownership. The state, and every extention thereof, is what’s wrong with human society. It stands as an impediment to human progress and serves as a means through which humans can exert forceful control over others.

We do not live in a free world, as our world is governed by states, laws, and money - all artificial forces of control.

No matter what the societal issue is you wish to champion, there is a much bigger picture that demands your attention, if only you had the perspective to see it. It is my sincere and humble hope that after reading this, you do.

We can then discuss what’s next.

In the car, on the way to work, listening to NPR. Since 2004, the 300+ US drone strikes on the Afghan/Pakistan border killed 70% “militants” (people that say no to US imperialism and allegedly have taken up arms). In other words, 30% of drone assassination victims were non-militants (people who may or may not say no to US imperialism and have not taken up arms). 30% innocent men, women, and children. How do you think the friends and families of the murdered innocent feel? Lives ruined by missiles fired from remote controlled US assassination machines. Is this a war on terror or a war of terror? If for every “militant” we kill, we inspire others to hate everything the US stands for and thus create more enemies to US imperialism, imagine how many more we create by murdering innocents and writing it off as collateral damage. Hey, remember that 16 year old US citizen our government drones assassinated in Yemen last fall? Yeah, that happened, too.

Fuck war. Fuck capitalism. Fuck states. Fuck religion. Fuck money. I hope the world explodes.

Sean Hannity on evil in the world vs. US sponsored terrorism

The other day I was listening to Hannity rant about good vs. evil (he got on to the topic by discussing Rick Santorum’s 2008 speech regarding Satan as the driving force behind moral degradation in America). Hannity pointed to only two events in world history which, for him, confirm that evil in the world exists: Nazi Germany/the Holocaust, and 9/11. He also tied into this discussion the situation with Iran/Israel.

I would like to take a moment and point out a few instances which I feel could have strengthened Hannity’s argument for evil existing in the world:

US sponsored murder of Indians, 1776-1973: Low estimate 10 million deaths, high estimate 114 million deaths

US invasions/occupations during the Banana Wars, 1898-1934: Cuba, Puerto Rico, Panama, Nicaragua, Haiti, Dominican Republic, Honduras, Mexico

US drops 2 nuclear bombs on Japan, killing to-date 395,000 men, women, and children

1947-49 - U.S. helps command extreme-right Greece party in Civil War.
Death toll: about 70,000 contributed by US-backed forces

1948-54 - CIA directs war against Huk Rebellion in Philippines.
Death toll: about 11,000

1950 - Independence movement crushed in Ponce, Puerto Rico
Death toll: conservative historians estimated about 8,000 peasants

1950-53 - Korean War
Death toll: about 1,776,000

1952 - CIA overthrows Democracy in Iran, installs Shah
Death toll: about 20,000

1954 - CIA directs invasion of Guatemala after new Democracy there nationalized U.S.-occupied lands
Death toll: about 140,000 missing and dead

1958 - In Lebanon, marine occupation against rebels
Death toll: about 2,000

1960-75+ - Vietnam War including Cambodia and Laos
Death toll: about 4,502,000 including civilians and resulting famines (conservative estimates)

1961 - Cuba’s Bay of Pigs Invasion fails
Death toll: about 4,000

1963 - In Iraq, CIA organizes coup against President and agrees to back formerly exiled Saddam
Death toll: about 7,000 including civilians

1964 - In Panama, troops kill protesters against US-owned canal
Death toll: about 1,000

1965 - CIA assists Indonesian coup
Death toll: about 900,000

1966 - Troops and bombers threaten pro-communist parties in Dominican Republic
Death toll: about 3,000

1966-96 - Green berets in Guatemala against rebels, US backs pro-American forces in country until 1996
Death toll: about 200,000

1970 - Directs marine invasion of Oman
Death toll: about 2,000

1973 - CIA directs coup to oust elected Marxist president in Chile
Death toll: 30,000… 3,000 later disappeared under US-installed dictator

1976-92 - CIA assists South-African rebels in Angola
Death toll: median estimate at 550,000

1981-90 - CIA directs Contra invasions in Nicaragua
Death toll: median estimate at 30,000

1982-84 - Marines expel Lebanese rebels, aided by Israel
Death toll: 40,000

1987-88 - US intervenes for Iraq against Iran
Death toll: about 150,000 during time-frame, 100,000 during Desert Storm, 350,000 from resulting famine

1989 - US invades to oust CIA-installed Panamanian government gone rouge
Death toll: 2,000

1992-94 - US-led occupation of Somalia during civil war
Death toll: 50,000 in combat, 300,000 by starvation

2001+ - US Occupies Afghanistan
Death toll: 120,000 including civilians and combatants and resulting Opium Wars

2003+ - Iraqi War
Death toll: 665,000 also by starvation, displacement

2004- Present - US drones assassinate 1,700 - 2,700 individuals in the Middle East

This does not include classified events, POWs, torture, Guantanamo Bay, etc. I wonder why Hannity overlooked these events?

(sources: http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_many_Native_Americans_were_killed_by_the_US_government, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banana_Wars, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drone_attacks_in_Pakistan, http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20081217214603AA4Ev5m)

Sean Hannity vs. NPR, or Brainwash vs. Fact

On the way home from work I like to play a game. I flip back and forth between Sean Hannity’s radio talk show and NPR news, and sometimes I get lucky - both stations, covering the same news, with wildly different “information” being communicated. Game on.

Yesterday, the topic was oil/petroleum/the price of gas in America/the Keystone pipeline.

Hannity (rough paraphrase): drill everywhere, with increased oil supply price of gas will decrease, America will gain energy independence, USA USA USA, anyone against drilling domestically/Keystone XL is promoting a radical environmental agenda

NPR: US gets 50%+ crude oil from western hemisphere, only ~15% from Middle East (Iran will not have large effect on gas prices domestically). US companies actually export petroleum (actual car fuel). US is 3rd world poducer of petroleum behind Saudi Arabia and Russia. Oil industry has largest subsidies and tax breaks (effective industry tax rate of 9%, while other industries average 25%). Tar sands oil extraction (Keystone Pipeline) is inefficient (requires more energy to extract fuel, generating 200-400% more greenhouse gas emmissons per barrel compared to traditional oil extraction), and involves similar groundwater contamination threats posed by hydraulic fracturing in natural gas extraction. Further, petroleum refined from Canadian tar sands in America would most likely continue to be exported (why would US oil companies sell a product in the US when they can sell it elsewhere for greater profit?)

Who do you think won this round of the game?

Here’s a hint: the increase in the domestic supply of oil will not see a decrease in the price of gas because US petroleum production is a private enterprise. The only time you see increased oil supplies resulting in super low fuel costs is with oil production and refinement taking place in states with nationalized oil industries (Saudi Arabia, Venezuela, Libya, etc.)

Here’s why the system is fucked

Exhibit A:

Enterprise Holdings, Inc. (Enterprise Rent-A-Car, National Car Rental, Alamo Rent A Car, etc.), is lobbying against legislation which would require automobile rental companies to service or replace recalled vehicles in their fleets.

This legislaton comes on the heels of the death of two females who were killed when their rental car spontaneously caught fire on the highway and crashed into a semi.

A corporation is spending money to lobby the government to be able to continue to make a profit by renting out unsafe vehicles to citizens.

This is our representative democracy at work.

This is capitalism.

There’s an age when boys read one of two books. Either they read Ayn Rand or they read Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings. One of these books leaves you with no grasp on reality and a deeply warped sense of fantasy in place of real life. The other one is about hobbits and orcs.

The Undisputed Truth

OK, everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but you’re also entitled to be informed if you’re opinion is predicated upon abject bullshit. For anyone who wants to pass off the current economic situation as ‘capitalism’, or thinks all the dirty foot bitches in the 99% should just get a job and stop complaining, you must understand that we do not have capitalism in this country. We have some corrupted blend of plutocracy/oligarchy plus a state-controlled/planned economy. The game is rigged from the start and everyone is playing with money that only has value because our national bank owes money to someone else. If that sounds confusing, that’s because it is. Thanks to cronyism/lobbying corruption/bailouts/government contracts/military-industrial complex/subsidies, the winners and losers are not chosen by the will of the people/the free market. They are chosen by the top 1% in our nation - a 1% that makes every critical decision impacting your life (whether you choose to acknowledge it or not). You can no longer afford to hide under the blanket of ignorance, nor apathy. Cowardice in the face of tyranny can be cured - indolence in the face of tyranny is fatal.

Exhibit A: Rampant, raw, unadulterated corporate greed

From BCC News:

Link: Steve Jobs vowed to ‘destroy’ Android

“Steve Jobs said he wanted to destroy Android and would spend all of Apple’s money and his dying breath if that is what it took to do so.”

The notion that you can own an idea or a technology in whole or in part is ridiculous. Everything you’ve ever thought, done, said, etc., evolved in part from an experience you had with something else that was thought, done, or said by someone else. Intellectual property is an abstract construct, much the same as nations, borders, and ownership in general, and is inherently an extension of control, force, and violence.

Philosophy (absolute natural truth) aside, I think this story illustrates brilliantly how the profit-above-all-else motive of some corporations casts an exceptionally negative light on the rest of the private sector, but more importantly, demonstrates the capitalistic paradox of monopolies/centric ownership (corporations win) vs. competition of firms (consumers wins).